-
-
18:38
»
Center for Democracy and Technology
President Bush today announced his intention to nominate CDT Vice President for Public Policy James X. Dempsey to serve a five year term on the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, an independent agency within the executive branch that will review the civil liberties impact of anti-terrorism policies and programs, providing advice on policy development and implementation and oversight of government actions relating to terrorism. In legislation adopted last year, Congress reconstituted the Board and made it independent of the White House. The position, which is subject to Senate confirmation, is part-time, so Dempsey, if confirmed, will continue in his position with CDT.
-
-
14:13
»
Center for Democracy and Technology
-
14:13
»
Center for Democracy and Technology
CDT filed comments with the Federal Communications Commission -- on behalf of more than twenty public interest and industry groups -- against the FCC's proposal to require censorship of a free nationwide wireless Internet access network. Although CDT supports the broad goal of deploying broadband nationwide, the comments argued that such government-mandated censorship would violate the First Amendment and would create an effectively unusable service due to the large amount of content and online services that would be blocked.
-
-
15:33
»
Center for Democracy and Technology
State attorneys general received thousands of complaints about online fraud and abuse in 2006 and 2007. Yet, with the exception of several notable standouts, few states brought significant cases in response to those complaints, according to a report released today from the Center for American Progress and the Center for Democracy and Technology. The study finds online fraud and abuse aren't given a high priority by most attorneys general. The report recommends several steps state attorneys general can take to protect online consumers, such as: assess the applicability and adequacy of state laws; develop computer forensic capabilities; train investigators and prosecutors to identify Internet fraud; and devote greater resources to enforcement efforts.
-
-
8:03
»
Center for Democracy and Technology
Today CDT and the Progress & Freedom Foundation jointly filed a "friend of the court" brief in the U.S. Supreme Court against the FCC's regulation of "fleeting expletives," arguing that the Commission's new policy of censoring one-off curse words violates both the Constitution and administrative law. CDT also called into question the FCC's overall authority to regulate speech on broadcast, noting that dramatic changes in media and technology over the past 30 years no longer make broadcast a "unique" medium deserving less than full First Amendment protection. The brief also argues that the convergence of broadcast with the Internet and other new media, and the rise of technological tools that allow families to control what media content enters the home, eliminates the need for continued government regulation of broadcast.
-
8:03
»
Center for Democracy and Technology
In a July 31 amicus brief filed in a federal court in Pennsylvania, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, joined by CDT, ACLU and the ACLU of Pennsylvania, argued that cell phone location information is protected by the Fourth Amendment. The brief argues that a court should require the government to obtain a warrant based on probable cause in order to gain access to cell site location information stored by a cell phone company.
-
-
11:05
»
Center for Democracy and Technology
CDT on Friday joined the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Citizen, and a group of 14 law professors in an "friend of the court" brief arguing that violating an online service's Terms of Service agreement isn't a criminal offense under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The brief, submitted in the case of United States v. Lori Drew, explains that the legal theory behind the Government's indictment of Ms. Drew would effectively criminalize the actions of millions of Internet users and raise significant due process and constitutional concerns.
-
11:05
»
Center for Democracy and Technology
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals today reversed a lower court decision that, as CDT and a number of others argued in a 2007 amicus brief, had the potential to chill innovation in products that use the Internet to provide storage and computing functions from remote locations. The lower court ruling had blocked Cablevision from rolling out a digital video recorder (DVR) system that stores recorded television programs on remote servers instead of in set top devices in the customers' homes. CDT applauds today's decision, which finds that providing such a remote DVR does not constitute direct copyright infringement. CDT also welcomes the court's finding that transitory data held in buffers for a mere 1.2 seconds do not constitute "copies" for purposes of the Copyright Act.
-
-
17:35
»
Center for Democracy and Technology
Newly released documents confirm that U.S. government border officials assert authority to rifle through the contents of laptop computers, cell phones and flash drives that travelers bring into the United States, even when officials have no suspicion that a device contains evidence of a crime. Devices can be taken from travelers, removed to a remote location, examined by officials unknown to the travelers, and returned days, weeks, or even months later.
-
17:35
»
Center for Democracy and Technology
The FCC today voted 3-2 to reprimand Comcast for interfering with some of its subscribers' BitTorrent uploads and failing to disclose the action. The ruling is a major development in the long-running debate over "Internet neutrality" and "network management." CDT agrees with the ruling's apparent premise that broadband providers should not target specific applications for inferior treatment and should be much more transparent about network management practices. CDT has serious concerns, however, about the potential breadth of the Commission's assertion of authority and the risk that it could open the door to greater FCC regulatory involvement in Internet issues. The full impact of the ruling will depend on the actual text of the order, which is not yet available.