<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>politicalbs.com &#187; CyberJournalist</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalbs.com/</link>
	<description>politicalbs.com &#187; CyberJournalist</description>
	<generator>Gregarius 0.5.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<item>
		<title>CyberJournalist: Channel 4′s latest web project reinvents quotations for the Twitter age</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/4Y5aeB7e50c/</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:12:23 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/4Y5aeB7e50c/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Quotations are ubiquitous, from Facebook and Twitter to media coverage and watercooler chats. But the experience of finding a quotation online is often messy and reliant on amateurish sites that seem to rely on the same old quotes &#8211; and that&#8217;s the problem a new Channel 4 project is aiming to fix. By Jemima Kiss</p>
<img src="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/03/01/poweredbyguardian.png" alt="Powered by Guardian.co.uk" /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2010/sep/02/channel4-mint-digital-arts-council-quotables">This article was written by Jemima Kiss, for guardian.co.uk on Thursday 2nd September 2010 12.05 UTC</a></p>
<p>&#8220;My favourite quotation is £8 10/- for a second-hand suit,&#8221; Spike Milligan <a href="http://quotabl.es/quotes/3609">once said</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://quotabl.es/search?query=quotations&amp;search_type=">Quotations</a> are ubiquitous, from Facebook and Twitter to media coverage and watercooler chats. But the experience of finding a quotation online is often messy and reliant on amateurish sites that seem to rely on the same old quotes &#8211; and that&#8217;s the problem a new <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/channel4">Channel 4</a> project is aiming to fix.</p>
<p><a title="New Zealand quotations (1) by PhillipC, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flissphil/1047265052/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1016/1047265052_a5e8cafd18.jpg" alt="New Zealand quotations (1)" /></a><br />
<em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flissphil/1047265052/">PhillipC</a> on Flickr. <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en_GB">Some rights reserved</a>.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://quotabl.es/">Quotables</a> wants to reinvent the quotations dictionary. Co-founded by Channel 4 and the <a href="http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/">Arts Council</a>, there&#8217;s a focus on literature but also some priority C4 areas including comedy, news, the arts and independent British cinema. C4&#8242;s new media commissioner for factual, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2009/mar/24/channel4-marketingandpr">Adam Gee</a>, said that despite the number of quotations sites already out there &#8211; from <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Main_Page">Wikiquote</a> and <a href="http://thinkexist.com/quotations">ThinkExist</a> to <a href="http://brainyquote.com/">BrainyQuote</a> and <a href="http://quotationsbook.com/">QuotationsBook</a> &#8211; there&#8217;s room to do much better, because many of those reuse the same databases and rehash the same misattributions and inaccuracies.</p>
<a href="http://quotabl.es/quotes/569">Charlie Brooker</a>: &#8220;Snakes. They&#8217;re like bits of rope, only angrier.&#8221;
<p>&#8220;We had the realisation that the way we interact with quotes online is really lacking in many respects,&#8221; said Gee. &#8220;It&#8217;s not a fun experience or an easy  experience, and when you do find something you have no idea if it is  accurate or not. Quotables is starting from a blank sheet, built from the preferences of an active community.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oscar Wilde and Socrates will make the cut eventually, but there&#8217;s as much of a focus on events, TV and popular culture; the end of <a href="http://quotabl.es/search?query=big+brother&amp;search_type=">Big Brother</a> has been a focus for Channel 4.</p>
<a href="http://quotabl.es/quotes/3961">Albert Einstein</a>: &#8220;It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.&#8221;
<p>Gee said there are four dimensions to the project. He hopes Quotables will become to quotes what <a href="http://www.delicious.com">Delicious</a> is to links, a standard utility for saving and sharing. There&#8217;s also a buzz element, capturing trends in quotes on different days; <a href="http://quotabl.es/search?query=tony+blair&amp;search_type=">Tony Blair</a> was a hot topic yesterday. And over time it value as a reference tool will increase, as will its community.</p>
<a href="http://quotabl.es/quotes/8597">David Gibson</a>, from the Edinburgh Fringe: &#8220;I&#8217;m currently dating a couple of anorexics. Two birds, one stone.&#8221;
<p>Is the popularity of short quotes a symptom of how the internet is rewiring our brains, impairing our ability to process long-form content? These are 75-word quotes. &#8220;By having these nuggets from great works of literature, great speeches, great articles, we&#8217;re encouraging the entirety to be read and that&#8217;s part of the ongoing programme of functionality. One aspect is we&#8217;re building a batch upload process of independent publishers so they can upload a selection of the best quotes from recent publications, and it gets published alongside links to <a href="http://www.amazon.com">Amazon</a> or their own online shops. But concision is really about encouraging a more considered, careful submission so people don&#8217;t submit a whole paragraph &#8211; what is the essence you are put across?&#8221;</p>
<p>Quotables was conceived and commissioned by Channel 4, built by <a href="http://www.mintdigital.com">Mint Digital</a> and co-founded by the Arts Council and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/channel4">Channel 4</a>. Gee describes it as halfway between a standard Channel 4 commission and an investment, more like that of <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2009/jun/01/channel4-research">4ip</a>. The aim is to make Quotables a sustainable, standalone business and it already has an office base and small team in Glasgow. Gee would not say how much had been invested in the project.</p>
<a href="http://quotabl.es/quotes/625">Terry Pratchett</a>: &#8220;Build a man a fire and he&#8217;ll be warm for the night. Set a man on fire and he&#8217;ll be warm for the rest of his life.&#8221;
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not extravagant but it&#8217;s not tight. And it has been budgeted for the long view. The emphasis is on building a lovely experience and a core of enthusiastic users and around them a community people enjoy being a part of.&#8221; He said that as well as advertising, there are plans to help the project sustain itself by adding merchandising &#8211; &#8220;<a href="http://www.moo.com">Moo</a>-style&#8221; hard products.</p>
<p>&#8220;People have been very generous in sharing the repositories of inspiration,&#8221; said Gee. &#8220;Quotables has the edge over what&#8217;s out there at the moment; the fact you have proper tools for the quotes &#8211; the ability to edit tags, the ability to correct things, for finding duplicates, proper attribution and more accuracy. And a system of lists as well as tags so you can keep your own stuff sorted.&#8221;</p>
<p>All of which reminds me of a line my Dad used to say was by Virginia Woolf, along the lines of: &#8220;Efficiency cuts the grass of the mind to its roots.&#8221; I&#8217;ve never been able to find it &#8211; does anyone know?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more from Quotables on its blog and you can subscribe to daily quotations from <a href="http://twitter.com/QuotablesLoves">Quotables on Twitter</a>.</p>
<a href="http://quotabl.es/quotes/5925">Woody Allen</a>: &#8220;If you&#8217;re not failing every now and again, it&#8217;s a sign you&#8217;re not doing anything very innovative.&#8221;
<p>• Elsewhere, Channel 4 is working with <a href="http://www.sixtostart.com/">Six to Start</a> on a project with the working title ABC &#8211; Arts Buzz Culture. &#8220;It&#8217;s an early-warning cultural radar system, particularly picking up on online buzz around discovering and sharing arts and culture events,&#8221; said Gee. If you frequently find events are sold out or are over by the time you&#8217;ve heard about them, this will be for you. It&#8217;s a working prototype, and the design side is being developed with <a href="http://www.xpt.com/">Rob Bevan of XPT</a>. &#8220;It&#8217;s a difficult design job &#8211; you&#8217;ve got to make it seem very simple and not overwhelming. The creativity and brilliance of the design is hidden in its simplicity, in many ways.&#8221; It&#8217;s personalised, social &#8211; and due out in 2011.</p>
<a href="http://quotabl.es/quotes/769">Dolly Parton</a>: &#8220;I&#8217;m not offended by all the dumb blonde jokes because I know I&#8217;m not dumb&#8230; and I&#8217;m also not blonde.&#8221;
<a href="http://oas.guardian.co.uk/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/guardianapis.com/media/oas.html/@Bottom"><br />
<img src="http://oas.guardian.co.uk/RealMedia/ads/adstream_nx.ads/guardianapis.com/media/oas.html/@Bottom" alt="Ads by The Guardian" /><br />
</a>
<p><img src="http://hits.guardian.co.uk/b/ss/guardiangu-apidev/1/H.20.3/98867?ns=guardian&amp;pageName=Quotables%3A+Channel+4%27s+latest+web+project+reinvents+quotations+for+the+Twitter+age+Article+1446553&amp;ch=Media&amp;c2=53729&amp;c4=Channel+4%2CSocial+media%2CMedia%2CDigital+media&amp;c3=guardian.co.uk&amp;c6=Jemima+Kiss&amp;c7=10-Sep-02&amp;c8=1446553&amp;c9=Article" alt="" /></p>
<p>guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2010</p>
<p></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sjdEPK6vMu22-a6utf8YkL51V78/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sjdEPK6vMu22-a6utf8YkL51V78/0/di"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sjdEPK6vMu22-a6utf8YkL51V78/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sjdEPK6vMu22-a6utf8YkL51V78/1/di"></img></a></p>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=4Y5aeB7e50c:1SWTbfb-GjM:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=4Y5aeB7e50c:1SWTbfb-GjM:D7DqB2pKExk"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=4Y5aeB7e50c:1SWTbfb-GjM:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=4Y5aeB7e50c:1SWTbfb-GjM:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=4Y5aeB7e50c:1SWTbfb-GjM:V_sGLiPBpWU"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=4Y5aeB7e50c:1SWTbfb-GjM:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=4Y5aeB7e50c:1SWTbfb-GjM:F7zBnMyn0Lo"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=4Y5aeB7e50c:1SWTbfb-GjM:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></img></a>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~4/4Y5aeB7e50c" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>CyberJournalist: Discovery Channel gunman first reported via Twitter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/G4TIMbHK6Dw/</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:44:02 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/G4TIMbHK6Dw/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	The news of a gunman at the Discovery Channel&#39;s headquarter&#39;s  Wednesday was broken by Twitter, not traditional media.
<p><img src="http://desmond.yfrog.com/Himg94/scaled.php?tn=0&#38;server=94&#38;filename=hdmd.jpg&#38;xsize=640&#38;ysize=640"></p>
<p>
<p>



 &#8220;As it has with other breaking news events &#8212; the landing of a jet on the Hudson River in 2009, the 2008 massacre in Mumbai &#8212; the story unfolded first in hiccupping fits and starts on Twitter, the much-hyped micro-blogging service that has turned millions of people into worldwide gossips, opinion-mongers and amateur news reporters,&#8221; The Washington Post&#39;s Howard Kurtz reports. 
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/01/AR2010090105987.html"></a><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/01/AR2010090105987.html">[www.washingtonpost.com]</a>
</p>


<p>
<p>Before camera crews and reporters could race to the scene, a shot of alleged hostage-taker James Lee was flashing around the world via Twitpic. The shot &#8212; full of menace and dread &#8212; was apparently taken by an office worker peering from a window several floors above the Discovery courtyard. The photo was apparently passed from an unidentified Discovery employee to another, who posted <a href="http://yfrog.com/2mhdmdj">the photo</a> on  and then distributed it via Twitter.</p>
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0xYmx6Q82AWhoyDp8GkITs7xs6A/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0xYmx6Q82AWhoyDp8GkITs7xs6A/0/di"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0xYmx6Q82AWhoyDp8GkITs7xs6A/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0xYmx6Q82AWhoyDp8GkITs7xs6A/1/di"></img></a></p>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=G4TIMbHK6Dw:D5uEkB4uOFU:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=G4TIMbHK6Dw:D5uEkB4uOFU:D7DqB2pKExk"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=G4TIMbHK6Dw:D5uEkB4uOFU:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=G4TIMbHK6Dw:D5uEkB4uOFU:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=G4TIMbHK6Dw:D5uEkB4uOFU:V_sGLiPBpWU"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=G4TIMbHK6Dw:D5uEkB4uOFU:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=G4TIMbHK6Dw:D5uEkB4uOFU:F7zBnMyn0Lo"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=G4TIMbHK6Dw:D5uEkB4uOFU:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></img></a>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~4/G4TIMbHK6Dw" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>CyberJournalist: The 6 reasons why people check in on foursquare</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/4kdZS0XXd4I/</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:42:58 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/4kdZS0XXd4I/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As foursquare continues to grow, a lot of folks outside tech circles have asked why people take the time to check-in. In an attempt to answer that, <a href="http://socialfresh.com/6-reasons-consumers-use-foursquare/">Jason Keith of socialfresh has identified 6 areas</a> where foursquare brings utilitarian value to &#8220;average&#8221; people. They include: playing a game, finding friends, making announcements, getting suggestions, getting rewards and recording history.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NTS9NwIgN3YYDxsyjtQzvJ3uru4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NTS9NwIgN3YYDxsyjtQzvJ3uru4/0/di"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NTS9NwIgN3YYDxsyjtQzvJ3uru4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NTS9NwIgN3YYDxsyjtQzvJ3uru4/1/di"></img></a></p>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=4kdZS0XXd4I:lKLH1Uf27M8:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=4kdZS0XXd4I:lKLH1Uf27M8:D7DqB2pKExk"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=4kdZS0XXd4I:lKLH1Uf27M8:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=4kdZS0XXd4I:lKLH1Uf27M8:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=4kdZS0XXd4I:lKLH1Uf27M8:V_sGLiPBpWU"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=4kdZS0XXd4I:lKLH1Uf27M8:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=4kdZS0XXd4I:lKLH1Uf27M8:F7zBnMyn0Lo"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=4kdZS0XXd4I:lKLH1Uf27M8:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></img></a>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~4/4kdZS0XXd4I" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>CyberJournalist: Flashback: 15 Sites That Were Before Their Time</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/zmLBusRpMBY/</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:42:17 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/zmLBusRpMBY/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Amazon.com&#8217;s first sale was fifteen years ago, and while the pioneering  online retailer eventually found success, many of its peers weren&#8217;t so  lucky. <a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/feature/dead-sites-web-1-0#ixzz0vkVEh2Bx">Esquire salutes great sites of the Web 1.0 era that never made  it.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/T77w6Mq8Zo-I0jCblKEkbHkEhNU/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/T77w6Mq8Zo-I0jCblKEkbHkEhNU/0/di"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/T77w6Mq8Zo-I0jCblKEkbHkEhNU/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/T77w6Mq8Zo-I0jCblKEkbHkEhNU/1/di"></img></a></p>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=zmLBusRpMBY:Fs3l0t1VErE:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=zmLBusRpMBY:Fs3l0t1VErE:D7DqB2pKExk"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=zmLBusRpMBY:Fs3l0t1VErE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=zmLBusRpMBY:Fs3l0t1VErE:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=zmLBusRpMBY:Fs3l0t1VErE:V_sGLiPBpWU"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=zmLBusRpMBY:Fs3l0t1VErE:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=zmLBusRpMBY:Fs3l0t1VErE:F7zBnMyn0Lo"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=zmLBusRpMBY:Fs3l0t1VErE:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></img></a>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~4/zmLBusRpMBY" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>CyberJournalist: Six digital trends to watch</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/p39RD5AujQM/</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:34:53 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/p39RD5AujQM/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Edelman&#8217;s Steve Rubel and David Armano have identified six digital trends and how organizations should address them.</p>
<p>Here is a brief summary of the trends, <a href="http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2010/07/trends.html">from Armano</a>&#8216;s blog, followed by their full presentation.</p>
<ol>
<blockquote>
<li>Marketing in the age of streams</li>
<p>Your customers, consumers and employees are no longer only visiting static Web pages but participating in conversations which increasingly occur off domain in “streams” flowing from Facebook, Twitter and even apps. In order to catch them, you must be highly relevant in their streams.</p>
<li>The Googleization of media</li>
<p>Quality Content and potent social connections in addition to traditional keywords are influencing how visible you are to the search engines. Everyone is media.</p>
<li>The data decade</li>
<p>Data is increasingly becoming available to anyone and everyone. From it we can derive insights into behaviors. We must become “data junkies” to fully harness this trend.</p>
<li>Business becomes social</li>
<p>Moving from designated spokesperson to employee engagement at scale—business itself is beginning to look more social as organizations start to engage all stakeholders in open and mutually beneficial ways.</p>
<li>Location, location, location</li>
<p>Where you are is becoming the new what are you doing as multiple platforms begin to adopt the new geolocation status update generating new kinds of data.</p>
<li>Private becomes public</li>
<p>Despite privacy concerns, applications and behaviors which support social sharing are still going strong as what is considered private becomes re-defined as we continue engaging in networks.</p></blockquote>
</ol>
<a title="Six Digital Trends To Watch by Steve Rubel and David Armano" href="http://www.slideshare.net/EdelmanDigital/six-digital-trends-to-watch-by-steve-rubel-and-david-armano">Six Digital Trends To Watch by Steve Rubel and David Armano</a></p>
View more presentations from <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/EdelmanDigital">Edelman Digital</a>.


<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tj5cDNbYlleoiKkhJcMkDi7Ztz4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tj5cDNbYlleoiKkhJcMkDi7Ztz4/0/di"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tj5cDNbYlleoiKkhJcMkDi7Ztz4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tj5cDNbYlleoiKkhJcMkDi7Ztz4/1/di"></img></a></p>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=p39RD5AujQM:lDR_eElwAIA:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=p39RD5AujQM:lDR_eElwAIA:D7DqB2pKExk"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=p39RD5AujQM:lDR_eElwAIA:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=p39RD5AujQM:lDR_eElwAIA:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=p39RD5AujQM:lDR_eElwAIA:V_sGLiPBpWU"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=p39RD5AujQM:lDR_eElwAIA:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=p39RD5AujQM:lDR_eElwAIA:F7zBnMyn0Lo"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=p39RD5AujQM:lDR_eElwAIA:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></img></a>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~4/p39RD5AujQM" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>CyberJournalist: Social Media Monopoly</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/w6ADwl8HvDQ/</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:29:33 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/w6ADwl8HvDQ/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Here&#8217;s a clever take on Monopoloy with a Social Media Angle <a href="http://www.bite.ca/bitedaily/2010/07/social-media-monopoly-board-game/">from Bite.ca</a>. &#8220;Pete Cashmore, Kevin Rose, Tom, Amber MacArthur, Crystal Gibson and  Ariana Huffington are fighting for social media dominance. Race around  the board picking up smartphones and computers but make sure you don’t  get sent to MySpace or you’ll risk losing everything, including your  reputation.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cyberjournalist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/social_media_monopoly_board3-580x580.jpg"><img src="http://www.cyberjournalist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/social_media_monopoly_board3-580x580.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-nVr1SezMHPFWKkY3930-qTzUfY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-nVr1SezMHPFWKkY3930-qTzUfY/0/di"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-nVr1SezMHPFWKkY3930-qTzUfY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-nVr1SezMHPFWKkY3930-qTzUfY/1/di"></img></a></p>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=w6ADwl8HvDQ:6hmdM56mDNA:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=w6ADwl8HvDQ:6hmdM56mDNA:D7DqB2pKExk"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=w6ADwl8HvDQ:6hmdM56mDNA:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=w6ADwl8HvDQ:6hmdM56mDNA:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=w6ADwl8HvDQ:6hmdM56mDNA:V_sGLiPBpWU"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=w6ADwl8HvDQ:6hmdM56mDNA:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=w6ADwl8HvDQ:6hmdM56mDNA:F7zBnMyn0Lo"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=w6ADwl8HvDQ:6hmdM56mDNA:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></img></a>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~4/w6ADwl8HvDQ" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>CyberJournalist: 7 tips on increasing traffic and engagement using Facebook</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/VTT8L3cnMz8/</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:42:32 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/VTT8L3cnMz8/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Facebook recently analyzed how the 100 top media sites are using its social plugins, as well as the pages of several top media  organizations and the stories they posted, including their content,  types of status update, and time of day. Among the findings were that certain ways of implementing the new Like buttons, such as including thumbnails of friends, could result in  3-5x greater click-through rates.</p>
<p><a href="http://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/398?ref=mf">Facebook&#8217;s Justin Osofsky outlines in more detail</a> what Facebook found and best practices in 7 areas:</p>
<ol>
<li> Driving audience and traffic through implementing the <a href="http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like">Like button</a>. Websites experienced 3-5x greater click-through rates on the Like  button when they implemented the version that includes thumbnails of  friends, enabled users to add comments (which 70% of top performing  sites did), and placed the Like button at the top and bottom of articles  and near visually exciting content like videos and graphics.</li>
<li>Driving audience and traffic through Publishing to users through Pages and Like button connections. In  our analysis of stories published by top media organizations, we found  that (a) stories involving emotional topics, passionate debates, and  important sports events have 2-3x the activity of other stories, (b)  status updates which ask simple questions or encourage a user to Like  the story have 2-3x the activity, and (c) stories published in the early  morning or just before bedtime have higher engagement.
<ol></ol>
</li>
<li>Increasing engagement by implementing the <a href="http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/activity">Activity Feed</a> and <a href="http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/recommendations">Recommendations</a> social plugins. Sites that place plugins above the fold and on multiple  pages receive more engagement. For instance, sites that placed the  Activity Feed on both the front and content pages received 2-10x more  clicks per user than sites with the plugins on the front page alone.</li>
<li>Increasing engagement by using Live Stream for live events. The <a href="http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/live-stream">Live Stream box</a>,  as notably implemented by CNN for the Obama inauguration, can create  engaging experiences on partner sites. For instance, during the World  Cup, there were over 1.5 million status updates through the Live Stream  box on media websites such as Univision, TF1, ESPN, Cuatro, RTVE, and  Telecinco.</li>
<li>Increasing engagement by creating timely pages. In addition to analyzing engagement on  stories, we also examined the effect of creating focused sub-pages and  found that they can have substantially higher engagement. For example,  stories published from a World Cup-focused Page of one major media  company had 5x the engagement rate per user than stories from the  company&#8217;s main Page.</li>
<li>Increasing engagement by using the <a href="http://developers.facebook.com/docs/api#search">search API</a> to create highly engaging visualizations that draw on status updates  from Facebook users who share their posts publicly. The New York Times  created an engaging <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/07/02/sports/soccer/facebook-worldcup.html">visualization</a> around the World Cup which sized players based on the frequency of  public status updates. Your site can do the same through any topic of  your choice, and show the buzz around everything from news items to  events to local debates.
<ol></ol>
</li>
<li> Seeing what&#8217;s working with Insights. Finally, media organizations can understand their customers better through <a href="http://www.facebook.com/insights">Facebook Insights</a>.  For example, one major German news site found Insights to be  particularly helpful when it was trying to engage a younger audience  online. Insights helped them optimize and understand the activities that  continued to engage this audience.
<ol></ol>
</li>
</ol>
<p>Below is a video of a recent presention from Osofsky about publishers can use Facebook&#8217;s technologies.</p>
<p><code></code></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/323gMGJJ_8RtRj-eSQxD1WZpvrE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/323gMGJJ_8RtRj-eSQxD1WZpvrE/0/di"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/323gMGJJ_8RtRj-eSQxD1WZpvrE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/323gMGJJ_8RtRj-eSQxD1WZpvrE/1/di"></img></a></p>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=VTT8L3cnMz8:kNCuLh9JnS0:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=VTT8L3cnMz8:kNCuLh9JnS0:D7DqB2pKExk"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=VTT8L3cnMz8:kNCuLh9JnS0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=VTT8L3cnMz8:kNCuLh9JnS0:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=VTT8L3cnMz8:kNCuLh9JnS0:V_sGLiPBpWU"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=VTT8L3cnMz8:kNCuLh9JnS0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=VTT8L3cnMz8:kNCuLh9JnS0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=VTT8L3cnMz8:kNCuLh9JnS0:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></img></a>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~4/VTT8L3cnMz8" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>CyberJournalist: Turn your Twitter stream into a people parade</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/N6A1N8Q_iDg/</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:50:26 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/N6A1N8Q_iDg/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><em><a href="http://www.cyberjournalist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/parade.jpg"><img src="http://www.cyberjournalist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/parade.jpg" alt="" /></a></em></p>
<p>
<p>Twitter visualisations come in many forms, but The Guardian calls <a href="http://isparade.jp/">IS Parade</a> &#8220;arguably the most inventive yet.&#8221; As an example, <a href="http://isparade.jp/292561">check out this visualization of @cyberjournalist Twitter followers.</a><br />
<em></em><img src="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/03/01/poweredbyguardian.png" alt="Powered by Guardian.co.uk" /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/pda/2010/jul/28/twitter-isparade"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/pda/2010/jul/28/twitter-isparade">This article was written by Jemima Kiss, for guardian.co.uk on Wednesday 28th July 2010 10.59 UTC</a></p>
<p>Twitter visualisations come in many forms, but <a href="http://isparade.jp/">IS Parade</a> is arguably the most inventive yet.  Start a &#8216;parade&#8217; of tweets across your csreen either by keyword, or by Twitter ID.</p>
<p>Use your own Twitter ID and you&#8217;ll see a parade of your own followers, which is a bit of an ego boost at least&#8230;</p>
<p>You can set up your own real-time parade by getting friends to tweet the same keyword, and then setting up a parade to follow it.</p>
<p>Not the most fuctional Twitter tool yet, but it does draw you in. All done by a Japanese agency to promote Sharp&#8217;s new <a href="http://au-is.jp/">IS series</a> Android netbook/smartphone.  <img src="http://hits.guardian.co.uk/b/ss/guardiangu-apidev/1/H.20.3/98867?ns=guardian&amp;pageName=IS+Parade%3A+Turn+your+Twitter+stream+into+a+people+parade+Article+1432144&amp;ch=Technology&amp;c2=53729&amp;c4=Twitter+%28Technology%29%2CSocial+networking%2CCool+tools+%28series%29%2CMedia%2CDigital+media%2CPDA+blog%2CBlogpost+%28Tone%29%2CJemima+Kiss%2CArticle+%28Content+type%29&amp;c3=guardian.co.uk&amp;c6=Jemima+Kiss&amp;c7=10-Jul-28&amp;c8=1432144&amp;c9=Article" alt="" /></p>
<a href="http://oas.guardian.co.uk/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/guardianapis.com/technology/oas.html/@Bottom"> <img src="http://oas.guardian.co.uk/RealMedia/ads/adstream_nx.ads/guardianapis.com/technology/oas.html/@Bottom" alt="Ads by The Guardian" /> </a>
<p>guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2010</p>
<p></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gX2PNZwm2P8uYk95yXOqYaOoVds/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gX2PNZwm2P8uYk95yXOqYaOoVds/0/di"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gX2PNZwm2P8uYk95yXOqYaOoVds/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gX2PNZwm2P8uYk95yXOqYaOoVds/1/di"></img></a></p>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=N6A1N8Q_iDg:6aSBcyoo2PI:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=N6A1N8Q_iDg:6aSBcyoo2PI:D7DqB2pKExk"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=N6A1N8Q_iDg:6aSBcyoo2PI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=N6A1N8Q_iDg:6aSBcyoo2PI:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=N6A1N8Q_iDg:6aSBcyoo2PI:V_sGLiPBpWU"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=N6A1N8Q_iDg:6aSBcyoo2PI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=N6A1N8Q_iDg:6aSBcyoo2PI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=N6A1N8Q_iDg:6aSBcyoo2PI:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></img></a>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~4/N6A1N8Q_iDg" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>CyberJournalist: 20 social media resources for nonprofits</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/6j2HnHzR7ko/</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:37:18 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/6j2HnHzR7ko/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Here is <a href="http://philanthropy411.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/20-social-media-resources-for-nonprofits/">a great list</a> of social media resources for nonprofits, including a Social Media Strategy 101 deck (embedded below).</p>
<a title="Introduction to Developing a Social Media Strategy for Cambridge Nonprofit Organizations" href="http://www.slideshare.net/cctvcambridge/introduction-to-developing-a-social-media-strategy-for-cambridge-nonprofit-organizations">Introduction to Developing a Social Media Strategy </a></p>



<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Z_4XW_7JLrEWXRP5_Te7RKfcjEo/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Z_4XW_7JLrEWXRP5_Te7RKfcjEo/0/di"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Z_4XW_7JLrEWXRP5_Te7RKfcjEo/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Z_4XW_7JLrEWXRP5_Te7RKfcjEo/1/di"></img></a></p>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=6j2HnHzR7ko:CcLRyBr0vSw:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=6j2HnHzR7ko:CcLRyBr0vSw:D7DqB2pKExk"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=6j2HnHzR7ko:CcLRyBr0vSw:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=6j2HnHzR7ko:CcLRyBr0vSw:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=6j2HnHzR7ko:CcLRyBr0vSw:V_sGLiPBpWU"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=6j2HnHzR7ko:CcLRyBr0vSw:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=6j2HnHzR7ko:CcLRyBr0vSw:F7zBnMyn0Lo"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=6j2HnHzR7ko:CcLRyBr0vSw:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></img></a>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~4/6j2HnHzR7ko" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>CyberJournalist: New report: Internet more important than newspapers, but still not trustworthy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/zIz0CvD99ds/</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:14:16 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~3/zIz0CvD99ds/</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Newspapers are now less important than the Internet as a source of information, yet the majority of online users say most online information is not reliable, according to <a href="http://store.digitalcenter.org/">the 10th annual study of the impact of the Internet on Americans by the Center for the Digital Future.</a></p>
<p>The study also found that 70 percent of online users believe that Internet advertising is &#8220;annoying,&#8221; yet 55 percent  of users said they would rather see Web advertising than pay for  content.</p>
<p>Among the study&#8217;s findings:</p>
<ul>
<li> Americans on the Internet &#8212; For the first time, the Internet is used by more than 80 percent of Americans &#8212; now 82 percent.   Weekly hours online &#8212; The average time online has now reached 19 hours per week.  Although more than two-thirds of Americans have gone online for a decade, the largest year-to-year increases in weekly online use have been reported in the two most recent Digital Future studies.</li>
<li>Gaps in Internet use in age groups &#8212; Not surprisingly, Internet use continues to increase as age decreases, with 100 percent of those under age 24 going online.  However, a surprisingly high percentage of Americans between 36 and 55 are not Internet users: among respondents age 46 to 55, 19 percent are non-users; among those 36 to 45, 15 percent are non-users.</li>
<li>Low adoption of new media &#8212; Although new media is used by large percentages of  Internet users age 24 and under, overall large percentages of Internet users never go online to do instant messaging (50 percent), work on a blog (79 percent), participate in chat rooms (80 percent), or make or receive phone calls (85 percent).</li>
<li>Does technology make the world a better place &#8212; The percentage of users age 16 and older who said that communication technology makes the world a better place has declined to 56 percent of users from its peak of 66 percent in 2002.</li>
<li>Internet and Political Campaigns &#8212; although more than 70 percent of users agree that the Internet is important for political campaigns, only 27 percent of users said that by using the Internet public officials will care more about what people think, and 29 percent said that the Internet can give people more of a say in what government does.</li>
<li>Buying online &#8212; 65 percent of adult Internet users buy online (the same as in 2008), and make an average of 35.2 purchases per year (up from 34.1 per year in 2008).</li>
<li>Internet impact on traditional retail declines &#8212; 61 percent of Internet users said that online purchasing has reduced their buying in traditional retail stores &#8212; down from 69 percent in 2008.</li>
<li> Top 10 online purchases &#8212; 59 percent of Internet users said they purchase books or clothes online, followed by gifts (55 percent), travel (53 percent), electronics/appliances (47 percent), videos (46 percent), computers or peripherals (41 percent), software or games (40 percent), CDs (40 percent), and products for hobbies (38 percent).</li>
<li>The study found that as sources of information – their primary function – newspapers rank below the Internet or television.  Only 56 percent of Internet users ranked newspapers as important or very important sources of information for them – a decrease from 60 percent in 2008 and below the Internet (78 percent), and television (68 percent).</li>
<li> Even lower are the percentages of users who consider newspapers important as sources of entertainment for them, now considered important by 29 percent of Internet users, and down from 32 percent in 2008 – also last among principal media.</li>
<li>Eighteen percent of Internet users said they stopped a subscription to a newspaper or magazine because they now get the same or related content online – down slightly from 22 percent in 2008, but nevertheless a strong indication that print newspapers can be sacrificed by a significant percentage of Internet users.</li>
<li> Internet users were asked where they would go for information provided by their newspaper if the print edition ceased, 59 percent said they would read the online edition of the publication; only 37 percent said they would instead read the print edition of another newspaper.</li>
<li> Twenty-two percent of users who read newspapers said they would not miss the print edition of their newspaper.</li>
<li>Sixty-one percent of users said that only half or less of online information is reliable &#8212; a new low level for the Digital Future Project.</li>
<li> Even more disturbing is that 14 percent of Internet users said that only a small portion or none of the information online is reliable – a percentage that has grown for the past three years and is now at the highest level thus far in the Digital Future Project.</li>
<li> Also revealing is the percentage of users who have limited trust even in the Web sites they visit regularly: although 78 percent said that most or all of the information on the sites they visit regularly is reliable (a decline from the previous two years), 22 percent of users say that only one half or less of information on sites they visit regularly is reliable.</li>
<li>Even search engines such as Google and Yahoo – traditional stalwarts of online credibility – have lost some of their luster.   While 53 percent of Internet users said that most or all of the information provided by search engines is reliable and accurate, that percentage declined slightly in the current Digital Future Study and is well below the peak of 64 percent in 2006.</li>
<li> 36 percent of users said only about half of information provided by search engines is reliable and accurate, and 12 percent said only a small portion or none of it was reliable.</li>
<li> Only 46 percent of users said they have some trust or a lot of trust in the Internet in general.  Nine percent of users have no trust in the Internet.</li>
</ul>
<p>Among the study&#8217;s findings:</p>
<ul>
<li> Americans on the Internet &#8212; For the first time, the Internet is used by more than 80 percent of Americans &#8212; now 82 percent.   Weekly hours online &#8212; The average time online has now reached 19 hours per week.  Although more than two-thirds of Americans have gone online for a decade, the largest year-to-year increases in weekly online use have been reported in the two most recent Digital Future studies.</li>
<li>Gaps in Internet use in age groups &#8212; Not surprisingly, Internet use continues to increase as age decreases, with 100 percent of those under age 24 going online.  However, a surprisingly high percentage of Americans between 36 and 55 are not Internet users: among respondents age 46 to 55, 19 percent are non-users; among those 36 to 45, 15 percent are non-users.</li>
<li>Low adoption of new media &#8212; Although new media is used by large percentages of  Internet users age 24 and under, overall large percentages of Internet users never go online to do instant messaging (50 percent), work on a blog (79 percent), participate in chat rooms (80 percent), or make or receive phone calls (85 percent).</li>
<li>Does technology make the world a better place &#8212; The percentage of users age 16 and older who said that communication technology makes the world a better place has declined to 56 percent of users from its peak of 66 percent in 2002.</li>
<li>Internet and Political Campaigns &#8212; although more than 70 percent of users agree that the Internet is important for political campaigns, only 27 percent of users said that by using the Internet public officials will care more about what people think, and 29 percent said that the Internet can give people more of a say in what government does.</li>
<li>Buying online &#8212; 65 percent of adult Internet users buy online (the same as in 2008), and make an average of 35.2 purchases per year (up from 34.1 per year in 2008).</li>
<li>Internet impact on traditional retail declines &#8212; 61 percent of Internet users said that online purchasing has reduced their buying in traditional retail stores &#8212; down from 69 percent in 2008.</li>
<li> Top 10 online purchases &#8212; 59 percent of Internet users said they purchase books or clothes online, followed by gifts (55 percent), travel (53 percent), electronics/appliances (47 percent), videos (46 percent), computers or peripherals (41 percent), software or games (40 percent), CDs (40 percent), and products for hobbies (38 percent).</li>
<li>The study found that as sources of information – their primary function – newspapers rank below the Internet or television.  Only 56 percent of Internet users ranked newspapers as important or very important sources of information for them – a decrease from 60 percent in 2008 and below the Internet (78 percent), and television (68 percent).</li>
<li> Even lower are the percentages of users who consider newspapers important as sources of entertainment for them, now considered important by 29 percent of Internet users, and down from 32 percent in 2008 – also last among principal media.</li>
<li>Eighteen percent of Internet users said they stopped a subscription to a newspaper or magazine because they now get the same or related content online – down slightly from 22 percent in 2008, but nevertheless a strong indication that print newspapers can be sacrificed by a significant percentage of Internet users.</li>
<li> Internet users were asked where they would go for information provided by their newspaper if the print edition ceased, 59 percent said they would read the online edition of the publication; only 37 percent said they would instead read the print edition of another newspaper.</li>
<li> Twenty-two percent of users who read newspapers said they would not miss the print edition of their newspaper.</li>
<li>Sixty-one percent of users said that only half or less of online information is reliable &#8212; a new low level for the Digital Future Project.</li>
<li> Even more disturbing is that 14 percent of Internet users said that only a small portion or none of the information online is reliable – a percentage that has grown for the past three years and is now at the highest level thus far in the Digital Future Project.</li>
<li> Also revealing is the percentage of users who have limited trust even in the Web sites they visit regularly: although 78 percent said that most or all of the information on the sites they visit regularly is reliable (a decline from the previous two years), 22 percent of users say that only one half or less of information on sites they visit regularly is reliable.</li>
<li>Even search engines such as Google and Yahoo – traditional stalwarts of online credibility – have lost some of their luster.   While 53 percent of Internet users said that most or all of the information provided by search engines is reliable and accurate, that percentage declined slightly in the current Digital Future Study and is well below the peak of 64 percent in 2006.</li>
<li> 36 percent of users said only about half of information provided by search engines is reliable and accurate, and 12 percent said only a small portion or none of it was reliable.</li>
<li> Only 46 percent of users said they have some trust or a lot of trust in the Internet in general.  Nine percent of users have no trust in the Internet.</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/TP6S8u_ULOAYjcVRRv4BJonWH_Q/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/TP6S8u_ULOAYjcVRRv4BJonWH_Q/0/di"></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/TP6S8u_ULOAYjcVRRv4BJonWH_Q/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/TP6S8u_ULOAYjcVRRv4BJonWH_Q/1/di"></img></a></p>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=zIz0CvD99ds:NZh3CPnyo0o:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=zIz0CvD99ds:NZh3CPnyo0o:D7DqB2pKExk"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=zIz0CvD99ds:NZh3CPnyo0o:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=zIz0CvD99ds:NZh3CPnyo0o:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=zIz0CvD99ds:NZh3CPnyo0o:V_sGLiPBpWU"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=zIz0CvD99ds:NZh3CPnyo0o:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?i=zIz0CvD99ds:NZh3CPnyo0o:F7zBnMyn0Lo"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?a=zIz0CvD99ds:NZh3CPnyo0o:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/cyberjournalist?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></img></a>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cyberjournalist/~4/zIz0CvD99ds" /> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
